Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article

When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana

Derick Folson 1 * ,
Francis Kwadwo Awuah 1
1 Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Educational Point, 3(2), 2026, e177, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
Publication date: Nov 08, 2026
Research Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Geometry instruction in pre-tertiary Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions is expected to develop formal mathematical reasoning while equipping learners with transferable spatial competencies for trade practice. However, research consistently documents a persistent disconnect between abstract classroom geometry and its vocational application, particularly in Anglophone African contexts where empirical accounts of this gap remain thin. This study investigates how geometry is currently taught in Ghanaian pre-tertiary TVET institutions and the factors that facilitate or hinder abstract-practical integration. Using a qualitative, multi-method design, the study draws on fifteen structured classroom observations, and interviews with mathematics facilitators, vocational instructors, learners, and administrators across participating institutions. Findings reveal that geometry instruction remains predominantly transmission-oriented, with 80% of the fifteen observed lessons organized around lecture and direct explanation, practical activities present in only 40%, and full vocational integration observed in a single lesson (descriptive proportions of this purposive sample rather than population estimates). Integration is sustained by exceptional individual conditions, notably facilitators’ prior industry experience and informal cross-disciplinary collaboration, while constrained by pervasive structural barriers, foremost among them an examination system rewarding procedural recall over applied spatial reasoning. Interpreted through Realistic Mathematics Education, Experiential Learning Theory, and Social Constructivism, these findings indicate that current instructional sequencing runs counter to principles of guided reinvention and experiential, socially mediated learning. This study provides an empirically grounded diagnostic account of the instructional and structural conditions that any future bridging framework for TVET geometry instruction in Ghana and comparable contexts must address.

KEYWORDS

TVET mathematics geometry instruction abstract-practical divide classroom observation realistic mathematics education

CITATION (APA)

Folson, D., & Awuah, F. K. (2026). When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana. Educational Point, 3(2), e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
Harvard
Folson, D., and Awuah, F. K. (2026). When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana. Educational Point, 3(2), e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
Vancouver
Folson D, Awuah FK. When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana. Educational Point. 2026;3(2):e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
AMA
Folson D, Awuah FK. When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana. Educational Point. 2026;3(2), e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
Chicago
Folson, Derick, and Francis Kwadwo Awuah. "When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana". Educational Point 2026 3 no. 2 (2026): e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885
MLA
Folson, Derick et al. "When Geometry Stays Abstract: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Tertiary TVET Instruction in Ghana". Educational Point, vol. 3, no. 2, 2026, e177. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19885

REFERENCES

  1. Abylkassymova, A., Kappasova, S., & Zhadrayeva, L. (2022). The development of mathematical literacy of schoolchildren through discourses. Bulletin of Abai KazNPU. Series of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, 79(3), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.51889/9582.2022.49.45.013
  2. Acheampong, P. A., & Awuah, F. K. (2025). The study of mathematics content in the context of vocational education: A systematic review. Physical and Mathematical Education, 40(4), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2025.v40i4-01
  3. Acheampong, P. A., Awuah, F. K., & Mensah, F. S. (2026). When mathematics remains trade-blind: Recontextualization and workplace mobilization in Ghanaian welding and fabrication education. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1898213. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1898213
  4. Akansiaba, C., Boateng, F. O., Appiagyei, E., Adiku, D. K., & Kwakye, D. O. (2025). Investigating perceived student engagement and mathematics achievement in contextualized lessons in TVET schools: Moderating effects, motivation and interest. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(4), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(4).04
  5. Anamuah-Mensah, J., & Asabere-Ameyaw, A. (2011). Science and mathematics in basic schools in Ghana. University of Education, Winneba.
  6. Armah, R. B., Cofie, P. O., & Okpoti, C. A. (2017). The geometric thinking levels of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Higher Education Research, 2(3), 98-106. https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.her.20170203.14
  7. Asante-Mensa, F.., Asiedu-Addo, S. K., Obeng-Denteh, W., & Armah, G. (2024). The effectiveness of the inquiry-based teaching approach on technical and vocational students’ mathematics achievement in Ghana. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research and Education, 2(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.64712/imjre.v2i1.293
  8. Asante-Mensa, F., Asiedu-Addo, S. K., Owusu-Ansah, S., Ansah, I., Agbata, B. C., & Obeng-Denteh, W. (2025). Perceptions of inquiry-based mathematics instruction in technical and vocational schools in Ghana. Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), 29-46. https://journalofmathed.scholasticahq.com/article/155199-perceptions-of-inquiry-based-mathematics-instruction-in-technical-and-vocational-schools-in-ghana.pdf
  9. Atuhurra, J. & Kaffenberger, M. (2022). Measuring education system coherence: Alignment of curriculum standards, examinations, and teacher instruction in Tanzania and Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, Article 102598, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102598
  10. Battista, M. T., Winer, M. L., & Frazee, L. M. (2017). How spatial reasoning and numerical reasoning are related in geometric measurement. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 355-357). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581320.pdf
  11. Benedičič, U., Duffy, G., & Sorby, S. (2022). An ongoing spatial intervention project in Irish secondary schools for improved engineering education. In SEFI 50th Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Towards a new future in engineering education, new scenarios that European alliances of tech universities open up (pp. 943-951). https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1321
  12. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2801095
  13. Boateng, R. O., & Awuah, F. K. (2026). Teaching plane geometry through real-life applications: A systematic review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(26), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0023
  14. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2017). Digital technology in mathematics education: Research over the last decade. In G. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 221-233). ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_14
  15. Buckley, J., Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2019). Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3
  16. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
  17. Coben, D., & Alkema, A. (2018). Scoping the development of a measure of adults’ numeracy (and literacy) practices. In: Safford-Ramus, K., Maaß, J., Süss-Stepancik, E. (Eds.), Contemporary research in adult and lifelong learning of mathematics (pp. 75-92). ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96502-4_5
  18. Cohen, S., Karimian Pour, C., & Kinsella, B. (2024). The persistence of mathematics: Integrating mathematical problem solving into the first-year engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 2025, Article 241. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18598
  19. Dalby, D., & Noyes, A. (2016). Locating mathematics within post-16 vocational education in England. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2015.1110828
  20. Davor, I., Dawmah, P., & Larbi, E. (2026). An investigation into senior high school students’ performance and difficulties in proving Euclidean geometry in mathematics curriculum: Evidence from Ghana. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 7(1), Article ep26005. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17990
  21. Dhakulkar, A., Olivier, J., & Bunt, B. J. (2023). A gamification approach to linear equations through creating and solving puzzles in a collaborative learning environment. In M. Havenga, J. Oliver, & B. J. Bunt (Eds.), Problem-based learning and pedagogies of play (pp. 141–166). AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.BK409.07
  22. Firdaus, F., Akib, I., & Sukmawati, S. (2025). A conceptual framework for implementing a problem-solving based mathematics curriculum in vocational education. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.766
  23. FitzSimons, G. E. (2014). Commentary on vocational mathematics education: Where mathematics education confronts the realities of people's work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9556-0
  24. Folson, D., & Awuah, F. K. (2025). Assessing topic alignment in pre-tertiary TVET core mathematics: A Ghanaian case study (2011-2023). Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 8(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.53449/yzxenc70.
  25. Folson, D., & Awuah, F. K. (2026). Workplace experience learning at the pre-tertiary TVET level in Ghana: A phenomenological study. SAGE Open, 16(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251411964
  26. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://link.springer.com/book/9780792312994
  27. Gbiang, P. B., & Attah, O. A. (2026). Technical, vocational education and training today: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 1(2). 22-33. https://doi.org/10.61955/LRCKVU
  28. Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028738
  29. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031005003
  30. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2013). Mathematics in the workplace: Issues and Challenges. In A. Damlamian, J. F. Rodrigues, & R. Strässer (Eds.), Educational interfaces between mathematics and industry: Report on an ICMI-ICIAM-study (pp. 43-50). (New ICMI study series; No. 16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02270-3_4
  31. Jones, S.E. (2006). Against technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960455
  32. Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 109-149), Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4
  33. Kaiser, G. (Ed.). (2017). Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3
  34. Kent, P., Noss, R., Guile, D., Hoyles, C., & Bakker, A. (2007). Characterizing the use of mathematical knowledge in boundary-crossing situations at work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1-2), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701307747
  35. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029_Experiential_Learning_Experience_As_The_Source_Of_Learning_And_Development
  36. Kolb, D.A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/experiential-learning-experience-as-the-source-of-learning-and-development/P200000000384/9780133892505?srsltid=AYCX9vIZfwo4msFxlRoy0rvGQeAqxa9Uzeo9K-Ajg4CaawNEONxAXH3d
  37. Kyeremeh, P., Kwadwo Awuah, F., & Clark Orey, D. (2025). Challenges regarding the integration of ethnomathematical perspectives into geometry teaching: The faculty reflection. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 4(3), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263251326330
  38. Kwateng, F., & Leong, W. Y. (2025). Bridging tradition and innovation: Incorporating indigenous engineering practices into Ghana's secondary school curriculum. INTI Journal, 2025(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202521
  39. Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014
  40. Lakin, J. M., Wai, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Corwith, S., Rothschild, D., & Uttal, D. H. (2024). Spatial thinking across the curriculum: Fruitfully combining research and practice. Gifted Child Today, 47(3), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241242722
  41. Moore, A. M., Fairhurst, P., Bennett, J. M., Harrison, C., Correia, C. F., & Durk, J. (2024). Assessment and practical science: identifying generalizable characteristics of written assessments that reward and incentivise effective practices in practical science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 46(7), 643-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2253366
  42. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/naturalistic-inquiry-1-842?srsltid=AYCX9vKGGk3BNd-70WJmGdjuVp1z9z5CM0uF6Q5XNNZg1Z6fgs5n_zfj
  43. Madrilejos , K. (2024). Predicting academic performance in mathematics through online learning constructs and content proficiencies. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(5), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0065
  44. Mayrhofer, J., Baldinger, S., Anđić, B., Riegler, V., & Weinhandl, R. (2026). Technology integration in physics education: using teachers’ age, gender, and teaching experience to explore differences in cognitive engagement strategies. Cogent Education, 13(1), Article 2710501. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2710501
  45. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565763
  46. Mjenda, M., Mutarutinya, V., & Owiti, D. (2023). Diagnostic assessment knowledge and practices among secondary school mathematics teachers in Dodoma, Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.114
  47. Mlambo, P. B., & Sotsaka, D. T. S. (2025). Exploring synergies in Euclidean geometry and isometric drawing: A snapshot on grade 12 mathematics and engineering graphics & design. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), Article em2617. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16172
  48. Motseki, P., & Jojo, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of using the geometer’s sketchpad to enhance TVET college level 4 students’ understanding of circle geometry. Progressio, 43, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/12422
  49. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
  50. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  51. Ntereke, N., & Mphunyane, M. (2025). Perceptions of secondary school mathematics teachers and the challenges faced in implementing grade 9 curriculum: A case of two schools in Lesotho. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(2), Article em080. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/16060
  52. Pantić, N. (2017). An exploratory study of teacher agency for social justice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.008
  53. Regnier, N. (2014). Informal learning in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (289-295). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_164
  54. Saripudin, M., Hamdan, A. H., & Asiah, N. (2023). Indonesian Muslim students' perception on the concept of peace, characteristics of peaceful people, and non-peaceful experiences in Madrasah Aliyah. Muslim Education Review, 2(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.56529/mer.v2i1.162
  55. Sawyer, R. K. (2022). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295
  56. Schneider M, Beeres K, Coban L, Merz S, Susan Schmidt S, Stricker J, & De Smedt B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), Article 12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
  57. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  58. Singh, P., Md Nasir, N. A., & Sian Hoon, T. (2024). The cognitive gap in the mathematical thinking abilities of high school leavers for college: Are they ready? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), Article em2529. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15577
  59. Siswantari, Sabon, S. S., Listiawati, N., Wirda, Y., Zulkardi, & Riyanto, B. (2025). Bridging mathematics and communication: Implementing realistic mathematics education principles for skill development. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 729-752. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp729-752
  60. Smith, J. P. (1999). Tracking the mathematics of automobile production: Are schools failing to prepare students for work? American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 835-878. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312036004835
  61. Sparrow, L. (2015). Mathematical knowledge for teaching at primary level. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 503-506). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_48
  62. Stolbova, I. D., K Gitman, Y., & Ovchinnikov, A. A. (2018, November). Integration of content and technologies of teaching within framework of geometrical-graphic training of students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 451, Article 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X%2F451%2F1%2F012117
  63. Streefland, L. (2012). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3168-1
  64. Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2019). Teacher-related challenges affecting the integration of ethnomathematics approaches into the teaching of geometry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), Article em1744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100633
  65. Susilo, B. E., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Critical thinking skills in integral calculus lecture based on mathematical dispositions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), Article 032045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032045
  66. Tall, D.O. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 481–492 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0192-6
  67. Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_2
  68. Vimbelo, S. W., & Bayaga, A. (2023). Humanising pedagogy in mathematics education at South African Technical and vocational education and training (TVET) colleges: Influence on TVET teaching and learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 633-655. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.34
  69. Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students’ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000172
  70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292
  71. Wedege, T. (2010). People’s mathematics in working life: Why is it invisible? Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 5(1), 89–97. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068213.pdf
  72. Xiong, X. (2024). Explore innovation and practice of collaborative training mode for vocational education teachers based on modern industrial college. Helios Multidisciplinary, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.70702/bdb/snoz1817
  73. Zhang, Y. (2025). Research on vocational education practice teaching mode under the background of “Internet plus”. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 20(1),1-https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.382589
  74. Zhou, D., Gomez, R., Wright, N., Rittenbruch, M., & Davis, J. (2022). A design-led conceptual framework for developing school integrated STEM programs: The Australian context. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09619-5

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.