Editorial Policy

Educational Point is committed to making prompt and fair decisions. We view editorial independence as crucial to our mission to publish high-quality scientific articles. Editors have complete control over the selection of articles published in our journals. Except for editorials, all published articles are rigorously peer-reviewed.

All submitted manuscripts must comply with the following requirements:

• The manuscript must be pertinent to the journal’s objectives and scope.
• The manuscript must be the author’s original work.
• Manuscript preparation must adhere to publishing ethics and author guidelines.
• The manuscript must utilize the English language effectively.
• The editorial office and the Editor-in-Chief will review all submitted manuscripts to ensure they meet the above requirements. At this point, the manuscript may be returned to the authors with a correction request or rejected without further consideration.

If a manuscript passes the initial evaluation, it will be assigned to an academic section editor, overseeing the remainder of the editorial process. Section editors are chosen based on their knowledge of the submission’s topic. The Section Editor invites external reviewers to assess the submission’s originality and quality. All of our reviewers should adhere to our reviewer guidelines. The section editor makes the final decision regarding the paper’s acceptance based on the opinions of at least two peer reviewers. Alternate section editors or expert reviewers must be used in the event of a conflict of interest. For special issues, guest editors assume editorial responsibility for the articles.

Authors dissatisfied with the editorial process or result may submit a detailed description of their complaints or appeals to editor@educationalpoint.net. Following COPE’s flowcharts and guidelines, all complaints and appeals will be investigated thoroughly.