Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers

Educational Point, 1(2), 2024, e108
Publication date: Sep 02, 2024

ABSTRACT

This research aimed to examine the extent to which pre-service teachers utilize video conferencing applications for learning purposes. It further sought to find the most used applications for video conferencing and the challenges that pre-service teachers are confronted with in the use of video conferencing for lectures. A multi-stage sampling method was employed to choose 340 participants for this research. A questionnaire and interview guide facilitated the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data for the study. The quantitative data was analyzed using frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA, while the qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis with narrative discussion. The study found that most pre-service teachers mostly used the Zoom app for live video conferencing. However, the lack of internet data bundles remained the major challenge for students when they engaged in online video conferencing. Furthermore, the study revealed no significant difference in the readiness for online synchronous video conferencing lectures with respect to gender, age, and program of study. The study recommended the creation of academic online communities for every semester course and the institution of a minimum number of hours of online video conferencing for every semester course to promote blended learning in colleges of education. In light of the findings, practitioners do not require additional eLearning expertise and separate tools to implement online synchronous video conferencing lectures based on these demographic variables.

KEYWORDS

online synchronous learning video conferencing emergency remote teaching post-COVID preservice teachers

CITATION (APA)

Korsah, D. P., Gbormittah, D., Abdulai, I. B., & Wireko-Ampem, J. K. (2024). Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers. Educational Point, 1(2), e108.
Harvard
Korsah, D. P., Gbormittah, D., Abdulai, I. B., and Wireko-Ampem, J. K. (2024). Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers. Educational Point, 1(2), e108.
Vancouver
Korsah DP, Gbormittah D, Abdulai IB, Wireko-Ampem JK. Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers. Educational Point. 2024;1(2):e108.
AMA
Korsah DP, Gbormittah D, Abdulai IB, Wireko-Ampem JK. Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers. Educational Point. 2024;1(2), e108.
Chicago
Korsah, Daniel Paa, Daniel Gbormittah, Issah Bala Abdulai, and Justice Kwame Wireko-Ampem. "Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers". Educational Point 2024 1 no. 2 (2024): e108.
MLA
Korsah, Daniel Paa et al. "Online synchronous learning through video conferencing: Perceptions and challenges of pre-service teachers". Educational Point, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024, e108.

REFERENCES

  1. Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
  2. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
  3. Aheto-Domi, B., deGraft-Yankson, P., Addo, C., & Bimpeh, G. K. (2021). Teacher trainees readiness for e-learning in colleges of education in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-7-1
  4. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  5. Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), Article 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
  6. Arthur-Nyarko, E., & Kariuki, M. G. (2019). Learner access to resources for eLearning and preference for eLearning delivery mode in distance education programs in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 1–8.
  7. Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7), Article e24821. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024821
  8. Bates, T. (2018). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd Ed., Vol. 2). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
  9. Bleakley, A., Rough, D., Edwards, J., Doyle, P., Dumbleton, O., Clark, L., & Cowan, B. R. (2021). Bridging social distance during social distancing: Exploring social talk and remote collegiality in video conferencing. Human–Computer Interaction, 37(5), 404–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1994859
  10. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8
  11. Bouchamma, Y., Basque, M., & Marcotte, C. (2021). Distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of higher education students and professors. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 28(1), 1–16.
  12. Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016). Fog and IoT: An overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2584538
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
  14. Culp-Roche, A., Debra, H., Hensley, A., Wilson, J., Thaxton-Wiggins, A., Otts, J. A., Fruh, S., & Moser, D. K. (2020). Generational differences in faculty and student comfort with technology use. SAGE Open Nursing, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820941394
  15. Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.020
  16. Dhawan, N., Carnes, M., Byars-Winston, A., & Duma, N. (2021). Videoconferencing etiquette: Promoting gender equity during virtual meetings. Journal of Women’s Health, 30(4), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8881
  17. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  18. Francis, J., Ball, C., Kadylak, T., & Cotten, S. R. (2019). Aging in the digital age: Conceptualizing technology adoption and digital inequalities. In B. Neves, & F. Vetere (Eds.), Ageing and Digital Technology. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_3
  19. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
  20. Ghanaweb. (2018, March 20). 29 million Ghanaians use 34 million mobile phones. GhanaWeb. https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/29-million-Ghanaians-use-34-million-mobile-phones-636095
  21. Ghanaweb. (2019, April 1). Using internet in Ghana is expensive - World Bank. GhanaWeb. https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/business/Using-internet-in-Ghana-is-expensive-World-Bank-734817
  22. Ghanaweb. (2022, March 20). Network connectivity is affecting our service - NHIS Director laments. GhanaWeb. https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Network-connectivity-is-affecting-our-service-NHIS-Director-laments-1495085
  23. Gyane, S. O. (2021). Online teaching and learning – the voice of teachers in the colleges of education in Ghana. Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), 4(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.01.2021.07.10
  24. Hallberg, A. (2017, December 22). The top 4 countries that have developed eLearning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/countries-that-have-developed-elearning-top-4
  25. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.
  26. Horzum, M. B. (2015). Interaction, structure, social presence, and satisfaction in online learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a
  27. Kuchta, M., & Miklošík, A. (2017). Evolution of digital video consumption patterns. Communication Today, 8(2), 58–69.
  28. Kwame, A. B. (2021, October 11). Internet connectivity ‘wahala’. Graphic Online. https://www.graphic.com.gh/features/opinion/ghana-news-internet-connectivity-wahala.html
  29. Kwapong, O. A. (2022). Online learning experiences of adult applicants to a university in Ghana during the COVID-19 outbreak. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(6), 598–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221125858
  30. Letseka, M., Letseka, M. M., & Pitsoe, V. (2018). The challenges of e-learning in South Africa. Trends in E-learning, 8, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74843
  31. Mukeredzi, T. (2020, May 4). Students reject online learning as data costs hiked by 225%. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200504142003239
  32. Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307
  33. Rapanta, C., B. L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  34. Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., & Ljubojevic, D. (2017). The effects of integrating social learning environment with online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2645
  35. Stöhr, C. (2017). Anywhere and anytime? An analysis of the use of mobile devices in MOOCs. In INTED2017 Proceedings, 8933–8943. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2107
  36. Tetteh-Richter, D. (2015). Perceptions of adult learners’ readiness in Ghana for online instructions in higher education [PhD dissertation, West Virginia University]. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports, 6786. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6786
  37. Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Tsai, M. C. (2020). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students’ learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(12), 1249–1265.
  38. UNICEF. (2021). Schools still closed for nearly 77 million students 18 months into pandemic. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/turkiye/en/press-releases/schools-still-closed-nearly-77-million-students-18-months-pandemic-unicef
  39. Winthrop, R. (2020). Top 10 risks and opportunities for education in the face of COVID-19. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2020/04/10/top-10-risks-and-opportunities-for-education-in-the-face-of-covid-19/
  40. Wolf, D. (2017). The benefits of live streaming in education. EdTech Magazine. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2017/04/benefits-live-streaming-education

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.