Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article

Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0

Evan P. Taja-on 1 * ,
Bryan Kim C. Dajero 2,
Melvin G. Barete 2
1 University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, PHILIPPINES2 San Isidro College, PHILIPPINES* Corresponding Author
Educational Point, 2(1), 2025, e120, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
Publication date: Jun 23, 2025
Research Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Mathematics plays a crucial role in fostering innovation and addressing societal challenges, making its enhancement essential in the context of Education 4.0. This study addresses a gap in the literature by providing expert-driven recommendations for transforming mathematics education in response to the demands of Education 4.0, which has been underexplored in existing research. Through an iterative consultation process, experts agreed on integrating key 21st-century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and digital literacy. The findings emphasize the importance of innovative teaching methods, ethical use of technology, and global competence in fostering adaptable, problem-solving learners. The study also highlights the need for inclusive and sustainable approaches within mathematics education. The proposed frameworks offer practical strategies for bridging theoretical content with real-world applications.

KEYWORDS

Delphi study Education 4.0 mathematical literacy mathematics education mathematics in the modern world

CITATION (APA)

Taja-on, E. P., Dajero, B. K. C., & Barete, M. G. (2025). Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0. Educational Point, 2(1), e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
Harvard
Taja-on, E. P., Dajero, B. K. C., and Barete, M. G. (2025). Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0. Educational Point, 2(1), e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
Vancouver
Taja-on EP, Dajero BKC, Barete MG. Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0. Educational Point. 2025;2(1):e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
AMA
Taja-on EP, Dajero BKC, Barete MG. Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0. Educational Point. 2025;2(1), e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
Chicago
Taja-on, Evan P., Bryan Kim C. Dajero, and Melvin G. Barete. "Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0". Educational Point 2025 2 no. 1 (2025): e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534
MLA
Taja-on, Evan P. et al. "Mathematics and modern society: A Delphi study exploring mathematics education towards Education 4.0". Educational Point, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025, e120. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16534

REFERENCES

  1. Abd Algani, Y. M. (2022). Role, need and benefits of mathematics in the development of society. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 3(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.31805/acjes.1063243
  2. Adnan, A. H. M., Karim, R. A., Tahir, M. H. M., Kamal, N. N. M., & Yusof, A. M. (2019). Education 4.0 technologies, Industry 4.0 skills and the teaching of English in Malaysian tertiary education. Arab World English Journal, 10(4), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no4.24
  3. Aghbolagh, H. D., Zamani, M., Paolini, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Balance seeking opinion dynamics model based on social judgment theory. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 403, Article 132336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132336
  4. Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
  6. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
  7. Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
  9. Chaka, C. (2022). Is Education 4.0 a sufficient innovative, and disruptive educational trend to promote sustainable open education for higher education institutions? A review of literature trends. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 824976. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.824976
  10. Chew, M. S. F., Shahrill, M., & Li, H. C. (2019). The integration of a problem-solving framework for Brunei high school mathematics curriculum in increasing student's affective competency. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7265.215-228
  11. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
  12. Costan, E., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Enriquez, L., Costan, F., Suladay, D., May Atibing, N., Aro, J. L., Evangelista, S. S., Maturan, F., Selerio, E., & Ocampo, L. (2021). Education 4.0 in developing economies: a systematic literature review of implementation barriers and future research agenda. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212763
  13. Dziatkovskii, A., Hryneuski, U., Krylova, A., & Loy, A. C. M. (2022). Chronological progress of blockchain in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM): A systematic analysis for emerging future directions. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 12074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912074
  14. Ernest, P. (2018). The ethics of mathematics: Is mathematics harmful? In P. Ernest (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematics education today. ICME-13 monographs. (pp. 187–216). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_12
  15. Gallardo, K. (2020). Competency-based assessment and the use of performance-based evaluation rubrics in higher education: Challenges towards the next decade. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.61
  16. Geiger, V., Gal, I., & Graven, M. (2023). The connections between citizenship education and mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55(5), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01521-3
  17. Gómez-Chacón, I. M., Bacelo, A., Marbán, J. M., & Palacios, A. (2024). Inquiry-based mathematics education and attitudes towards mathematics: Tracking profiles for teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(3), 715–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00468-8
  18. González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
  19. Hafni, R. N., Herman, T., Nurlaelah, E., & Mustikasari, L. (2020). The importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education to enhance students’ critical thinking skill in facing the industry 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), Article 042040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042040
  20. Hallström, J., Norström, P., & Schönborn, K. J. (2023). Authentic STEM education through modelling: An international Delphi study. International Journal of STEM education, 10(1), Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00453-4
  21. Harefa, D., & Hulu, F. (2024). Mathematics learning strategies that support Pancasila moral education: Practical approaches for teachers. Afore: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299
  22. Hayati, T. R., & Kamid, K. (2019). Analysis of mathematical literacy processes in high school students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i3.70
  23. Hendriana, H., Johanto, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The role of problem-based learning to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and self confidence. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 291–300. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5394.291-300
  24. Hımmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896
  25. Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), Article 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
  26. Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning toward enhancing mathematical thinking: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(4), 3548–3561.
  27. Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: A literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104
  28. Kang, N.-H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y
  29. Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., & Lesh, R. (2020). Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education (pp. 173–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003064527-10
  30. Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3), 79–94.
  31. Khoo, N. A. K. A. F., Ishak, N. A. H. N., Osman, S., Ismail, N., & Kurniati, D. (2022). Computational thinking in mathematics education: A systematic review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2633(1), Article 030043. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102618
  32. Khreisat, M. N., Khilani, D., Rusho, M. A., Karkkulainen, E. A., Tabuena, A. C., & Uberas, A. D. (2024). Ethical implications of AI integration in educational decision making: Systematic review. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 8521–8527. http://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4406
  33. Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2019). Developing teachers’ environmental literacy through inquiry-based practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), Article em1687. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103065
  34. Layco, E. P. (2022). Mathematics Education 4.0: Teachers competence and skills readiness in facing the impact of industry 4.0 on education. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 1233–1259.
  35. Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
  36. Majka, M. (2024). The Delphi methodology. Novomatic Technology Poland.
  37. Martin, D. B. (2019). Equity, inclusion, and antiblackness in mathematics education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592833
  38. McPherson, S., Reese, C., & Wendler, M. C. (2018). Methodology update: Delphi studies. Nursing Research, 67(5), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000297
  39. Mengual-Andrés, S., Roig-Vila, R., & Mira, J. B. (2016). Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y
  40. Mhlanga, D. (2020). Industry 4.0: The challenges associated with the digital transformation of education in South Africa. The Impacts of Digital Transformation, 13(51), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9
  41. Misra, P. K. (2018). Lifelong mathematics learning for adult learners and open educational resources. In K. Safford-Ramus, J. Maaß, & E. Süss-Stepancik (Eds.), Contemporary research in adult and lifelong learning of mathematics. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 269–283). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96502-4_15
  42. Mizukami, Y., & Nakano, J. (2022). International comparison of cross-disciplinary integration in industry 4.0: A co-authorship analysis using academic literature databases. PLoS ONE, 17(10), Article e0275306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275306
  43. Mogoş, R. I., Bodea, C. N., Dascălu, M. I., Safonkina, O., Lazarou, E., Trifan, E. L., & Nemoianu, I. V. (2018). Technology enhanced learning for industry 4.0 engineering education. Revue Roumaine Des Sciences Techniques, Série Électrotechnique et Énergétique, 63(4), 429–435.
  44. Naisola-Ruiter, V. (2022). The Delphi technique: A tutorial. Research in Hospitality Management, 12(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2022.2080942
  45. Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorization (IC): A systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction, 111(6), 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13314
  46. Nhleko, Y., & van der Westhuizen, T. (2021). Curriculum alignment: The perspectives of university students on the impact of Industry 4.0 on entrepreneurship education within higher education. Proceedings of the 16th European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 642–651). https://doi.org/10.34190/EIE.21.247
  47. Novita, R., & Herman, T. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1), Article 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027
  48. Pais, A., & Costa, M. (2020). An ideology critique of global citizenship education. In C. Lapping (Ed.), Freud, Lacan, Zizek and education (pp. 72–87). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351111270-6
  49. Palinussa, A. L., Molle, J. S., & Gaspersz, M. (2021). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematical reasoning and communication skills in rural contexts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20640
  50. Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital technologies in Education 4.0. Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20291
  51. Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23), Article e39988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988
  52. Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), Article 042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088
  53. Rusdi, Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., & Lufri (2020). Designing mathematics learning models based on realistic mathematics education and literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), Article 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012055
  54. Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS%2FV8-I9%2F4593
  55. Sharma, P. (2019). Digital revolution of Education 4.0. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(2), 3558–3564. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1293.129219
  56. Sitopu, J. W., Khairani, M., Roza, M., Judijanto, L., & Aslan, A. (2024). The importance of integrating mathematical literacy in the primary education curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 121–134.
  57. Skovsmose, O. (2020). Critical mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 154–159). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_34
  58. Stephan, M. (2020). Sociomathematical norms in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 802–805). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_143
  59. Suharta, I., & Suarjana, I. (2018). A case study on mathematical literacy of prospective elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11228a
  60. Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
  61. Taja-on, E. P., Roble, D. B., & Lomibao, L. S. (2024). Mathema Asclepius: A systematic review of mathematics shaping medical frontiers. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 37–43.
  62. Teo, T., Unwin, S., Scherer, R., & Gardiner, V. (2021). Initial teacher training for twenty-first century skills in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0): A scoping review. Computers & Education, 170, Article 104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104223
  63. Usmonov, M. (2024). General concept of mathematics and its history. INDEXING, 1(1), 71–75.
  64. Vinitha, K., Prabhu, R. A., Bhaskar, R., & Hariharan, R. (2020). Review on industrial mathematics and materials at Industry 1.0 to Industry 4.0. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 3956–3960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.331
  65. Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O. L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
  66. Yulıanto, T., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, İ. (2019). Effects of the 21st century learning model and problem-based models on higher order thinking skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 749–755. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.629084
  67. Zakaria, M. I., Maat, S. M., & Khalid, F. (2019). A systematic review of problem based learning in education. Creative Education, 10(12), 2671–2688. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012194
  68. Zhang, W., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Ethnomathematics and its integration within the mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 151–157.
  69. Zubair, M. (2023). A brief history of information theory by Claude Shannon in data communication. Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences, 13(1), 23–30.

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.