Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article Next article

AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication

Chandan Adhikari 1 * ,
Prabir Kumar Das 1,
Samapika Das Biswas 1
1 Institute of Engineering & Management Kolkata, Salt Lake Campus* Corresponding Author
Educational Point, 2(2), 2025, e137, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
Publication date: Dec 24, 2025
Review Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

The rapid rise of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT has introduced new dynamics into higher education, particularly in the domains of academic writing and scholarly communication. This study investigates how ChatGPT influences three interrelated dimensions: productivity, inclusivity, and academic integrity. A qualitative content analysis of forty peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and professional reports published between November 2022 and March 2024 was conducted to synthesize emerging perspectives. The analysis reveals that ChatGPT enhances productivity by streamlining drafting, editing, and citation processes, and it fosters inclusivity by reducing linguistic barriers that often marginalize non-native English speakers in global academic publishing. At the same time, significant concerns arise regarding plagiarism, authorship attribution, and the erosion of critical thinking skills, underscoring the need for clear ethical and institutional guidelines. This paper contributes to the literature by reframing ChatGPT not merely as a technological tool, but as a systemic force reshaping scholarly communication. By highlighting both opportunities and risks, the study underscores the importance of developing balanced strategies—integrating AI literacy, institutional policy frameworks, and responsible usage practices—to ensure that ChatGPT strengthens, rather than undermines, the integrity and equity of higher education.

KEYWORDS

ChatGPT academic writing AI in higher education generative AI writing assistance AI ethics in academic writing

CITATION (APA)

Adhikari, C., Das, P. K., & Das Biswas, S. (2025). AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication. Educational Point, 2(2), e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
Harvard
Adhikari, C., Das, P. K., and Das Biswas, S. (2025). AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication. Educational Point, 2(2), e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
Vancouver
Adhikari C, Das PK, Das Biswas S. AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication. Educational Point. 2025;2(2):e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
AMA
Adhikari C, Das PK, Das Biswas S. AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication. Educational Point. 2025;2(2), e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
Chicago
Adhikari, Chandan, Prabir Kumar Das, and Samapika Das Biswas. "AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication". Educational Point 2025 2 no. 2 (2025): e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
MLA
Adhikari, Chandan et al. "AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Impact on Scholarly Communication". Educational Point, vol. 2, no. 2, 2025, e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641

REFERENCES

  1. Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
  2. Abdallah, N., Katmah, R., Khalaf, K., & Jelinek, H. F. (2025). Systematic review of ChatGPT in higher education: Navigating impact on learning, wellbeing, and collaboration. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101866
  3. Adel, A., & Alani, N. (2025). Can generative AI reliably synthesise literature? Exploring hallucination issues in ChatGPT. AI & Society, 40, 6799-6812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02406-7
  4. Allam, H., Dempere, J., Akre, V., Parakash, D., Mazher, N., & Ahamed, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: an argument of Chat-GPT use in education. 2023 9th International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT), https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT59889.2023.10184267
  5. Alqahtani, N. (2024). Benefits, challenges, and attitudes toward ChatGPT in English writing courses at Saudi Universities. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1739
  6. Alyasiri, O. M., Salman, A. M., & Salisu, S. (2024). ChatGPT revisited: Using ChatGPT-4 for finding references and editing language in medical scientific articles. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Article 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101842
  7. Amano, T., Bowker, L., & Burton-Jones, A. (2025). AI-mediated translation presents two possible futures for academic publishing in a multilingual world. PLoS Biology, 23(6), Article e3003215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003215
  8. Anthony, A., Sharma, S., & Sharma, S. (2025). Is ChatGPT the future of academic writing? A sequential explanatory study to explore generative conversational AI as an academic writing support tool for research scholars. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 45(1-2), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676251353105
  9. Ariyaratne, S., Iyengar, K. P., & Botchu, R. (2023). Will collaborative publishing with ChatGPT drive academic writing in the future? British Journal of Surgery, 110(9), 1213-1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad198
  10. Aruleba, K., Sanusi, I. T., Obaido, G., Ogbuokiri, B., & Mienye, I. D. (2025). Beyond the prompt: Student strategies, ethical reflections, and learning with ChatGPT in computer science. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09899-7
  11. Asad, M. M., Shahzad, S., Shah, S. H. A., Sherwani, F., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). ChatGPT as artificial intelligence-based generative multimedia for English writing pedagogy: challenges and opportunities from an educator’s perspective. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(5), 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2024-0021
  12. Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 818-824. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009
  13. Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294
  14. Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411
  15. Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education-a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21501-21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x
  16. Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/4/296
  17. Bom, H.-S. H. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academic writing: a roundtable discussion. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 57(4), 165-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-023-00809-2
  18. Campo, L., Delgado, N., Etxabe-Urbieta, J. M., Kanso, H., & Gueye, M. L. (2025). Relationship Between the Use of ChatGPT and Plagiarism in Higher Education: The Influence of Gender, Age and Previous Academic Results. Innovative Higher Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09830-z
  19. Chen, C., & Gong, Y. (2025). The role of AI-assisted learning in academic writing: A mixed-methods study on Chinese as a second language students. Education Sciences, 15(2), 141. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/141
  20. Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 10(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6
  21. Chukwuere, J. E. (2024). Today's academic research: The role of ChatGPT writing. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i1.639
  22. Cong-Lem, N., Soyoof, A., & Tsering, D. (2025). A systematic review of the limitations and associated opportunities of ChatGPT. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(7), 3851-3866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2344142
  23. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  24. Debat, H., Okafor, I. A., Shitindo, M., Amaral, O. B., Izzati, N., Basu Mallick, C., ... & Santacruz-Perez, C. (2025). How the Global South is reshaping scholarly communication. Elife, 14, e108426. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.108426
  25. Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1206936. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
  26. Dennstädt, F., Zink, J., Putora, P. M., Hastings, J., & Cihoric, N. (2024). Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain. Systematic Reviews, 13(1), Article 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02575-4
  27. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
  28. Dietrich, L. K., & Grassini, S. (2025). Assessing ChatGPT acceptance and use in education: a comparative study among german-speaking students and teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22151-22176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13658-7
  29. Emara, I. F. (2025). A linguistic comparison between ChatGPT-generated and nonnative student-generated short story adaptations: a stylometric approach. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00388-z
  30. Feng, H. (2024, January). Real-Time Language Assistance in Teaching Academic English Writing to Graduate Students Based on Language Intelligence Technology (ChatGPT). In 2024 IEEE 7th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation (ECEI) (pp. 313-316). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECEI60433.2024.10510872.
  31. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
  32. Garcia, M. B. (2025). ChatGPT as an Academic Writing Tool: Factors Influencing Researchers’ Intention to Write Manuscripts Using Generative Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(24), 15514-15528. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2499158
  33. Gruda, D. (2024). Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing. Nature, 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01042-3
  34. Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J.-A., Baker, P. R. A., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273
  35. Guo, F., Li, T., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2025). One year in the classroom with ChatGPT: empirical insights and transformative impacts. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1574477. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1574477
  36. Gupta, P., Ding, B., Guan, C., & Ding, D. (2024). Generative AI: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques. Data and Information Management, 8(2), 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2024.100066
  37. Herbold, S., Hautli-Janisz, A., Heuer, U., Kikteva, Z., & Trautsch, A. (2023). A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays. Scientific reports, 13(1), 18617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45644-9
  38. Hu, H., Zhou, Q., & Hashim, H. (2025). Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 965. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05351-4
  39. Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), Article 1148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10164801/
  40. Hwang, S. I., Lim, J. S., Lee, R. W., Matsui, Y., Iguchi, T., Hiraki, T., & Ahn, H. (2023). Is ChatGPT a “fire of prometheus” for non-native English-speaking researchers in academic writing?. Korean Journal of Radiology, 24(10), 952. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0773
  41. Hysaj, A., Dean, B. A., & Freeman, M. (2025). Exploring the purposes and uses of generative artificial intelligence tools in academic writing for multicultural students. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(7), 1686-1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2488862
  42. Jain, A., Nimonkar, P., & Jadhav, P. (2025). Citation integrity in the age of AI: evaluating the risks of reference hallucination in maxillofacial literature. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.004
  43. Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
  44. Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873-15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
  45. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
  46. Kim, S.-G. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 45(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x
  47. Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology, 307(2), e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
  48. Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. Tesl-Ej, 27(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
  49. Lalwani, N. (2025). Plagiarism in publications: All about being fair!. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 35(S 01), S36-S45. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791745
  50. Lendvai, G. F. (2025). ChatGPT in academic writing: A scientometric analysis of literature published between 2022 and 2023. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(3), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251350203
  51. Li, J., Zong, H., Wu, E., Wu, R., Peng, Z., Zhao, J., ... & Shen, B. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English academic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students-the educational application of ChatGPT. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 736. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y
  52. Li, Y., Datta, S., Rastegar-Mojarad, M., Lee, K., Paek, H., Glasgow, J., ... & Xu, Y. (2025). Enhancing systematic literature reviews with generative artificial intelligence: development, applications, and performance evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 32(4), 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf030
  53. Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Lepp, H., Ji, W., Zhao, X., ... & Zou, J. (2025). Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers. Nature Human Behaviour, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02273-8
  54. Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072
  55. Liu, Z. (2024). Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2024-0260
  56. Luo, X., Chen, F., Zhu, D., Wang, L., Wang, Z., Liu, H., ... & Chen, Y. (2024). Potential roles of large language models in the production of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e56780. https://doi.org/10.2196/56780
  57. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
  58. Meyer, J. G., Urbanowicz, R. J., Martin, P. C., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P.-C., Bright, T. J., Tatonetti, N., Won, K. J., & Gonzalez-Hernandez, G. (2023). ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. BioData Mining, 16(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9
  59. Misra, D. P., & Chandwar, K. (2023). ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and scientific writing: What authors, peer reviewers and editors should know. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 53(2), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715231181023
  60. Mo, Z., & Crosthwaite, P. (2025). Exploring the affordances of generative AI large language models for stance and engagement in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 75, 101499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101499
  61. Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600-3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23
  62. Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT integration in higher education for personalized learning, academic writing, and coding tasks: A systematic review. Computers, 14(2), 53. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/14/2/53
  63. Nweke, M. C., Florez-Martin, M., Ackerley, S., & Truscott, F. (2024). Teaching scientific writing in the era of ChatGPT. PCE Official Conference Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2758-0962.2024.37
  64. Parker, J. L., Becker, K., & Carroca, C. (2023). ChatGPT for automated writing evaluation in scholarly writing instruction. Journal of Nursing Education, 62(12), 721-727. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20231006-02
  65. Paster, J. (2025). Potentials and limitations of AI as an academic writing assistant for non-native English speakers: An assessment framework for ChatGPT-generated texts. City State Journal, 2(1), 43-55. https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CS_J/article/view/1066
  66. Phokoye, S. P., Dlamini, S., Mthalane, P. P., Luthuli, M., & Moyane, S. P. (2025). A comprehensive review of ChatGPT in teaching and learning within higher education. Informatics, 12(3), 74. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9709/12/3/74
  67. Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
  68. Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N. A., ... & Aristovnik, A. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS One, 20(2), Article e0315011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315011
  69. Rudnicka, K. (2025). Can Grammarly and ChatGPT accelerate language change? AI-powered technologies and their impact on the English language: wordiness vs. conciseness. ArXiv, Article 2502.04324. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04324
  70. Saad, A., Jenko, N., Ariyaratne, S., Birch, N., Iyengar, K. P., Davies, A. M., ... & Botchu, R. (2024). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: an observational study. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 18(2), 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102946
  71. Sastre, A., Iglesias, A., Morato, J., & Sanchez-Cuadrado, S. (2024). Is ChatGPT able to generate texts that are easy to understand and read? World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, https://hdl.handle.net/10016/45231
  72. Scherbakov, D., Hubig, N., Jansari, V., Bakumenko, A., & Lenert, L. A. (2025). The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 32(6), 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf063
  73. Schmidt, L., Cree, I., Campbell, F., & WCT EVI MAP group. (2025). Digital Tools to support the systematic review process: An introduction. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 31(3), e70100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70100
  74. Shen, Y., & Chen, L. (2025). ‘Critical chatting’ or ‘casual cheating’: how graduate EFL students utilize ChatGPT for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2479141
  75. Shopovski, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, AI for scientific writing: A literature review. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0011.v1
  76. Singh, S. P., Khan, I. A., & Mitra, S. K. (2024). Scope and limitations of chatgpt in research and academic writing. Digital Journal of Clinical Medicine, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.55691/2582-3868.1177
  77. Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg787
  78. Titus, L. M. (2024). Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy. Cognitive Systems Research, 83, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174
  79. Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
  80. Xie, X., Zhang, L. J., & Wilson, A. J. (2025). Comparing ChatGPT feedback and peer feedback in shaping students’ evaluative judgement of statistical analysis: A case study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 884. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070884
  81. Xing, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT in learning and instructing statistics and data analytics. Teaching Statistics, 46(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12367
  82. Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2024). ChatGPT-empowered writing strategies in EFL students' academic writing: Calibre, challenges and chances. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(15). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i15.49219
  83. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
  84. Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.