Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
Educational Point, 3(2), 2026, e165, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
Publication date: Aug 18, 2026
ABSTRACT
The Higher Education sector is being revolutionized by AI, with machine learning, natural language processing and generative AI applications. Yet, with the fast pace of technological evolution, both the possibilities and threats of AI incorporation have been spread out. This study includes an integrated multimethod systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the dual landscape of AI in higher education. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, systematic searches of Web of Science (n=1,631), PubMed (n=1,349), and Scopus (n=1,439) yielded 4,419 records (2021-2025). Following screening for duplication and eligibility, 110 studies (85 high and 25 medium quality) were included for thematic synthesis. A concurrent bibliometric analysis of 1,227 documents in Scopus was performed to depict author citation networks, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling by source and country, using VOSviewer. The study identified Jiao, Ouyang, and Zheng as the most cited authors; the most frequently used keywords are 'ChatGPT' (173 times) since late 2022. Academic support, automated grading, teacher development, perceived usefulness, personalization of learning, and prediction of performance. The perceived ease of use, 24/7 access to technology, administrative efficiency; and academic integrity, data issues, integration barriers, technological limitations, equity concerns. And attitudinal barriers were identified as opportunity and challenge domains, respectively, during the thematic synthesis process. This study offers a dual landscape framework which means that there are no opportunities without challenges, and no challenges without opportunities. It delivers an evidence-based typology for institutional AI strategy, and priority areas for policy intervention, practically. The methodologically, it shows the usefulness of the combination of bibliometric and systematic review for complete literature synthesis. This research aims to explore the opportunities and challenges in integrating AI into higher education, based on a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of relevant literature.
KEYWORDS
CITATION (APA)
Kidega, C., Lucy, A. C., Irene, E. C., & Solomon, F. (2026). Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Point, 3(2), e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
Harvard
Kidega, C., Lucy, A. C., Irene, E. C., and Solomon, F. (2026). Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Point, 3(2), e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
Vancouver
Kidega C, Lucy AC, Irene EC, Solomon F. Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Point. 2026;3(2):e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
AMA
Kidega C, Lucy AC, Irene EC, Solomon F. Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Point. 2026;3(2), e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
Chicago
Kidega, Charles, Aciro Can Lucy, Egbosimba Chinazom Irene, and Fobi Solomon. "Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis". Educational Point 2026 3 no. 2 (2026): e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
MLA
Kidega, Charles et al. "Visualizing the Dual Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Multimethod Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis". Educational Point, vol. 3, no. 2, 2026, e165. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/19172
REFERENCES
- Abbass, H. A. (2019). Social integration of artificial intelligence: Functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust. Cognitive Computation, 11(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12559-018-9619-0
- Abubaker, N. M. N., Kashani, S. M., Alshalwy, A. M., & Garib, A. (2025). Reshaping higher education in MENA with generative AI: A systematic review. J. A. Boivin, J. A. Al-Obaidi, & M. N. Rao (Eds.), Emerging technologies transforming higher education: Instructional design and student success (pp. 231–256). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3904-6.CH010
- Ahmed, N. S. J. I., & Hamdan, A. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on education: A perspective on future learning. In A. Hamdan & A. Harraf (Eds.), Business Development via AI and Digitalization (pp. 645–652). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62102-4_54
- Акмеше, О. Ф., Кьор, Х., & Ербей, Х. (2021). Use of machine learning techniques for the forecast of student achievement in higher education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 82(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.33407/ITLT.V82I2.4178
- Alghamdi, A. A., Alanezi, M. A., & Khan, Z. F. (2020). Design and implementation of a computer aided intelligent examination system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I01.11102
- Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055
- Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100294
- Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
- Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
- Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-022-00937-2
- Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
- Borenstein, J., & Howard, A. (2021). Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7
- Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective: Part II: The application of socio-technical theory. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1(4), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/249019
- Bozkurt, A. (2019). Intellectual roots of distance education: A progressive knowledge domain analysis. Distance Education, 40(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1681894
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
- Çebi, A., & Karal, H. (2017). An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for evaluating students’ project. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(3), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3065
- Chen, H., & Anyanwu, C. C. (2025). AI in education: Evaluating the impact of Moodle AI-powered chatbots and metacognitive teaching approaches on academic performance of higher-institution Business Education students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12197–12212. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-024-13235-4
- Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
- Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). A holistic approach to the design of artificial intelligence (AI) education for K-12 schools. TechTrends, 65(5), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00637-1
- Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100118
- Ciecierski-Holmes, T., Singh, R., Axt, M., Brenner, S., & Barteit, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for strengthening healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic scoping review. NPJ Digital Medicine, 5(1), Article 162. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41746-022-00700-Y
- Coates, H., Croucher, G., & Calderon, A. (2025). Governing Academic Integrity: Ensuring the authenticity of higher thinking in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(4), 2015–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09639-7
- Costa-Mendes, R., Oliveira, T., Castelli, M., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2021). A machine learning approximation of the 2015 Portuguese high school student grades: A hybrid approach. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1527–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-020-10316-Y/TABLES/6
- Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., & Kent, C. (2020). Impact of an artificial intelligence research frame on the perceived credibility of educational research evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(2), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40593-019-00188-W
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
- Durães, D., Lacerda, B., Bezerra, R., & Novais, P. (2025). Predictive analytics in education: A comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting student performance. M. F. Santos, J. Machado, P. Novais, P. Cortez, P. M. Moreira (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 141–153). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73497-7_12
- Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. Plagiarism in Higher Education. Libraries Unlimited. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400697142
- Fahimirad, M., & Kotamjani, S. S. (2018). A review on application of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning in educational contexts. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8(4), 106–118. https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijld88/v8y2018i4p106-118.html
- Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: Regressing or expanding? Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8415–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12174-W
- Gomez, M. J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2022). Analyzing the evolution of digital assessment in education literature using bibliometrics and natural language processing. J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital-based assessment and innovative practices in education (pp. 178–200). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2468-1.ch009
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Gupta, A. K., & Khosla, C. (2021). Prediction of student’s academic performance using machine learning-systematic review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3833317
- Gupta, K. P., & Bhaskar, P. (2020). Inhibiting and motivating factors influencing teachers’ adoption of Ai-based teaching and learning solutions: Prioritization using analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 693–723. https://doi.org/10.28945/4640
- Hashmi, N., & Bal, A. S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons, 67(5), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.05.005
- Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. The Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
- Hough, D. (2023, October 10). Student guidance for the responsible use of AI. https://altc.alt.ac.uk/blog/2023/10/student-guidance-for-the-responsible-use-of-ai/
- Hu, Z., & Qiu, C. (2025). AI teaching assistants in hybrid learning: Strengths and limitations in healthcare education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(7), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.7.27
- Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
- Jaiswal, A., Arun, C. J., & Varma, A. (2022). Rebooting employees: Upskilling for artificial intelligence in multinational corporations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1891114
- Jiménez-García, E., Ruiz-Lázaro, J., Martínez-Requejo, S., & Redondo-Duarte, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and chatbots for sustainable higher education: A systematic review. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 28(2), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43240
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
- Kahn, K., & Winters, N. (2021). Constructionism and AI: A history and possible futures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1130–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13088
- Kangwa, D., Msafiri, M. M., & Fute, A. (2025a). Balancing innovation and ethics: Promote academic integrity through support and effective use of GenAI tools in higher education. AI and Ethics, 5(4), 3497–3530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00689-6
- Kangwa, D., Msafiri, M. M., & Fute, A. (2025b). Exploring the factors that promote a balance between academic integrity and the effective use of genai tools in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 41(5), Article e70109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70109
- Karkoulian, S., Sayegh, N., & Sayegh, N. (2025). ChatGPT unveiled: Understanding perceptions of academic integrity in higher education-a qualitative approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09543-6
- Khan, Z. F., & Alotaibi, S. R. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in m-health: A healthcare system perspective. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8894694
- Kidega, C., Zhanjun, W., Rajabu, I. M., Chinazom Irene, E., & Mahmood, A. (2025). Decolonizing minds with machines: AI as a partner in reimagining critical thinking pedagogy for East Africa’s academic renaissance. S. Maqbool, H. M. I. Zafeer, & A. Tariq (Eds.), AI-powered cognitive tutors and the new frontier of personalized learning (pp. 239–273). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4217-7.CH010
- Kidega, C., Zhanjun, W., Mariam Rajabu, I., & Mapalilo Frank, G. (2026). Decolonizing sustainability in African TVET: A literature-based framework for curriculum integration of indigenous knowledge and green skills. Africa Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.69641/afritvet.2026.111213
- Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 755914. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2022.755914
- Kim, T. W., Lee, H., Kim, M. Y., Kim, S. A., & Duhachek, A. (2023). AI increases unethical consumer behavior due to reduced anticipatory guilt. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(4), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-021-00832-9
- Kumar, V., & Boulanger, D. (2020). Explainable automated essay scoring: Deep learning really has pedagogical value. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 572367. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2020.572367/BIBTEX
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Liang, E. S., & Bai, S. (2025). Generative AI and the future of connectivist learning in higher education. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 18(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2386085
- Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, S. (2023a). Utility of ChatGPT in clinical practice. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, Article e48568. https://doi.org/10.2196/48568
- Liu, M., Ren, Y., Nyagoga, L. M., Stonier, F., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2023b). Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools. Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/FER3.10
- Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
- Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Baltes, J., Guerra, R., Li, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 580820. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.580820
- MaHong, & SlaterTammy. (2015). Using the developmental path of cause to bridge the gap between AWE scores and writing teachers’ evaluations. Writing & Pedagogy, 7(2–3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26376
- Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURES.2017.03.006
- Ministry of Digital Development. Singapore Smart Nations. (2024, December 30). Smart Nation 2.0: Initiatives in Singapore. Govtech Singapore. https://www.tech.gov.sg/technews/our-enhanced-smart-nation-vision-paving-the-way-for-a-new-digital-era/
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., Gøtzsche, P. C., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000097
- Msambwa, M. M., Daniel, K., & Lianyu, C. (2024). Integration of information and communication technology in secondary education for better learning: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10, Article 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSAHO.2024.101203
- Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review on opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Algorithms, 18(6), Article 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352
- Nicolae, M., & Nicolae, E. E. (2018). Leadership in Higher Education – coping with AI and the turbulence of our times. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.2478/PICBE-2018-0061
- Okolo, C. T., Aruleba, K., & Obaido, G. (2023). Responsible AI in Africa—Challenges and opportunities. In D. O. Eke, K. Wakunuma, S. Akintoye (Eds.), Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 35–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_3
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021, Article 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Paraschiv, E.-A., Elena Cîrnu, C., & Victor Vevera, A. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and cybersecurity in electronic health records: Addressing challenges and optimizing healthcare systems. In V. K. Parimala (Ed.), Electronic health records - issues and challenges in healthcare systems. IntechOpen Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007041
- Reina-Parrado, M., Román-Graván, P., & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2025). Learning to teach AI: Design and validation of a questionnaire on artificial intelligence training for teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.14.1.249
- Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 14-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-020-00193-3/FIGURES/6
- Rodríguez-Ruiz, J., Marín-López, I., & Espejo-Siles, R. (2025a). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2507–2524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12906-6
- Ruiz Rodriguez, A., Chiappe, A., & Ortega González, E. (2025b). The digital educator’s toolkit: Leveraging AI for effective learning analytics. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 12(2), Article e12363. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2025.23163
- Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(8), Article 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569
- Salloum, S. A., Salloum, A., & Alfaisal, R. (2024). Objectives and obstacles of artificial intelligence in education. Studies in Big Data, 144, 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_38
- Sánchez-Núñez, P., Cobo, M. J., De Las Heras-Pedrosa, C., Peláez, J. I., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Opinion mining, sentiment analysis and emotion understanding in advertising: A Bibliometric Analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 134563-134576. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009482
- Schmidt, D. A., Alboloushi, B., Thomas, A., & Magalhaes, R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation. Computers and Education Open, 9, Article 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEO.2025.100274
- Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/EJED.12532
- Spatioti, A., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2023). Educational design and evaluation models of the learning effectiveness in e-learning process: A systematic review. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 318–347. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1177297
- Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H. Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., Emberson, J. R., Hernán, M. A., Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D. R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, J. J., Lasserson, T., Li, T., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2019, Article 366. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.L4898
- Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/JALT.2023.6.1.17
- Tebenkov, E., & Prokhorov, I. (2021). Machine learning algorithms for teaching AI chat bots. Procedia Computer Science, 190, 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.06.086
- Topali, P., Haelermans, C., Molenaar, I. & Segers, E. (2025). Pedagogical considerations in the automation era: A systematic literature review of AIEd in K-12 authentic settings. British Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 2777–2809. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4200
- Trisnawati, W., Putra, R. E., & Balti, L. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligent in education toward 21 st century skills: A literature review. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 2(2), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v2i2.152
- UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://doi.org/10.54675/ewzm9535
- UNESCO publishes Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence and Education - Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). Retrieved January 22, 2026, from http://en.moe.gov.cn/news/press_releases/201909/t20190902_396913.html
- Villegas-Ch, W., Arias-Navarrete, A., & Palacios-Pacheco, X. (2020). Proposal of an architecture for the Integration of a chatbot with artificial intelligence in a smart campus for the improvement of learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4), Article 1500. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12041500
- Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.124167
- Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., & Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on international students in higher education: Generative AI, chatbots, analytics, and international student success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), Article 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13116716
- Wood, E. A., Ange, B. L., & Miller, D. D. (2021). Are we ready to integrate artificial intelligence literacy into medical school curriculum: Students and faculty survey. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211024078
- Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI-assisted learning environments: an empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 870777. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.870777/BIBTEX
- Wyatt-Smith, C., Lingard, B., & Heck, E. (2020). Digital disruption in teaching and testing; Assessments, big data, and the transformation of schooling (first edition). Routledge.
- Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40594-022-00377-5
- Yağcı, M. (2022). Educational data mining: Prediction of students’ academic performance using machine learning algorithms. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40561-022-00192-Z
- Yu, S., & Lu, Y. (2021). An introduction to artificial intelligence in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2770-5
- Yvan, N. J. C., Charles, K., & Lucy, A. C. (2026). The impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on assessment equity for non-native English-speaking medical students: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-026-09303-7
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
- Zhang, D., Wijaya, T. T., Wang, Y., Su, M., Li, X., & Damayanti, N. W. (2025). Exploring the relationship between AI literacy, AI trust, AI dependency, and 21st century skills in preservice mathematics teachers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 14281-. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99127-0
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.