Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article

Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe

Daglous Masveta 1 *
1 Chinhoyi University of Technology, ZIMBABWE* Corresponding Author
Educational Point, 3(1), 2026, e162, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
Publication date: Jun 29, 2026
Research Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

This qualitative study investigates the use of educational technology (EdTech) to reach marginalized populations through non-formal education (NFE) in Zimbabwe. Grounded in Paulo Freire's Critical Pedagogy and employing an interpretive research philosophy, the study collected data from 50 educators using open-ended questionnaires distributed in November 2025. Thematic analysis of responses reveals four key findings. First, the digital divide is fundamentally economic and infrastructural: high data costs and unreliable electricity are critical barriers, necessitating investment in solar-powered community centers and school-based access points. Second, pedagogical relevance requires radical localization—incorporating indigenous languages, real-life examples, and practical, skills-based subjects delivered through low-bandwidth platforms such as WhatsApp and SMS/USSD. Third, sustainability depends on community ownership: projects must transition from foreign funding dependency to locally governed models, with trained community facilitators and traditional leaders ensuring ethical accountability. Fourth, inclusivity demands universal design principles that leverage built-in accessibility features for learners with disabilities, alongside robust data protection frameworks to safeguard against exploitation. The study theorizes a "Freirean EdTech" that positions technology not as a neutral tool but as a site of emancipatory practice, where success is measured by a project's ability to foster critical consciousness, economic agency, and collective self-determination. Implications for policy include regulatory interventions to lower data costs, curriculum reforms prioritizing localization, and governance frameworks that embed community oversight. The study concludes that sustainable EdTech in NFE requires moving beyond technological determinism toward socially embedded, ethically governed, and culturally responsive approaches.

KEYWORDS

educational technology non-formal education digital divide critical pedagogy community ownership zimbabwe inclusivity sustainability

CITATION (APA)

Masveta, D. (2026). Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point, 3(1), e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
Harvard
Masveta, D. (2026). Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point, 3(1), e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
Vancouver
Masveta D. Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point. 2026;3(1):e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
AMA
Masveta D. Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point. 2026;3(1), e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
Chicago
Masveta, Daglous. "Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe". Educational Point 2026 3 no. 1 (2026): e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
MLA
Masveta, Daglous "Using EdTech to Reach the Unreached: Innovative Approaches to Non-Formal Education in Zimbabwe". Educational Point, vol. 3, no. 1, 2026, e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866

REFERENCES

  1. Acuil, A. D., & Grob-Zakhary, R. (2024, March 26). South Sudan: Rebuilding a nation through the power of learning. Global Partnership for Education. https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/south-sudan-rebuilding-nation-through-power-learning
  2. Afzal, A., & Hussain, N. (2020). Impact of community service learning on the social skills of students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 55-70. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1259929
  3. Aliakbari, M., & Faraji, E. (2011). Basic principles of critical pedagogy. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences, 17, 77–85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266224451_Basic_Principles_of_Critical_Pedagogy
  4. Bailur, S., & Masiero, S. (2012). The complex position of the intermediary in telecenters and community multimedia centers. Information Technologies & International Development, 8(1), 27-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277714916_The_Complex_Position_of_the_Intermediary_in_Telecenters_and_Community_Multimedia_Centers
  5. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. J., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I., Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N., Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4636440
  6. Buckler, A., Twiner, A., & Power, T. (2025). “I had to adjust my character so I was able to help”: How community volunteers in rural Zimbabwe developed as educators in a context of crisis and school closures. Journal of Educational Change, 26(4), 631-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-025-09535-2
  7. Cambridge University Press. (2017). 2017 ELT international catalogue. Cambridge University Press. https://issuu.com/cambridgeupelt/docs/2017_international_catalogue_high_r
  8. Cameron, L., Pon, C., D’Angelo, S., & Cooper, K. (2024). Supporting children’s access and retention in education in emergency, fragile and conflict-affected contexts: GPE KIX scoping study working paper. https://www.gpekix.org/knowledge-repository/supporting-childrenseducation-emergency-contexts
  9. CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
  10. Chakera, S., Haffner, D., & Harrop, E. (2020). Structured pedagogy: For real-time equitable improvements in learning outcomes. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Region. https://www.unicef.org/esa/media/7511/file/ESA-Structured-Pedagogy-2020.pdf
  11. Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835815
  12. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19971801093
  13. Chidakwa, N., & Khanare, F. P. (2024). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Overcoming digital divides in Zimbabwean rural learning ecologies. Futurity Education, 4(2), 125-147. https://futurity-education.com/index.php/fed/article/view/269
  14. Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the River City curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9156-4
  15. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003
  16. Corbeil, J. R., & Corbeil, M. E. (2017). The EdTech Blog: Learning beyond the classroom through social spaces for informal learning. Issues in Information Systems, 18(4), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2017_57-64
  17. Crotty, M. (1998). Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115700
  18. Cunliffe, A.L. (2010). Retelling tales of the field: In search of organisational ethnography 20 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109340041
  19. Dencik, L., & Cable, J. (2017). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| The Advent of Surveillance Realism: Public Opinion and Activist Responses to the Snowden Leaks. International Journal of Communication, 11, 763–781. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5524
  20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-5-242504
  21. Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Disability, locative media, and complex ubiquity. In U. Ekman, J. D. Bolter, L. Diaz, M. Sondergaard, & M. Engberg (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing, complexity and culture (pp. 272-287), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781129
  22. Evans, D. K., Acosta, A. M., & Yuan, F. (2021, October 19). Girls’ education at scale. Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/girls-education-scale
  23. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581130
  24. Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5210445
  25. Global Campaign for Education. (2025). GCE EdTech Report. https://campaignforeducation.org/images/downloads/f1/1825/edtechreportfinalisedweb.pdf
  26. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2002). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5771/9780742577015
  27. Gonen, S. I. K., & Kizilay, Y. (2023). Taking the picture of informal digital learning of English (IDLE) in a higher education Turkish context. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 178-191. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1397171
  28. Graham, S. (2010). Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894484
  29. Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167190
  30. Hafner, C. A. (2019). Digital literacies for English language learners. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 899-918). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_46
  31. Harris, D. B., & Roter, D. L. (2024). Profound love and dialogue: Paulo Freire and liberation education. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice, 8(3), e118-120. https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20240613-02
  32. Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women's Studies International Forum, 34(6), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001
  33. Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. B. (Eds.). (2017). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South: African minds. International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1005330
  34. Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/
  35. Jerasa, S., & Boffone, T. (2021). BookTok 101: TikTok, digital literacies, and out-of-school reading practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1199
  36. Kam, M., Agarwal, A., Kumar, A., Lal, S., Mathur, A., Tewari, A., & Canny, J. (2008). Designing e-learning games for rural children in India: a format for balancing learning with fun. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems, 7, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394452
  37. Keesing-Styles, L. (2003). The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. Radical Pedagogy, 5(1), 1-23. https://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue5_1/03_keesing-styles.html
  38. Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown. https://assetbucketpublic.7169.prh.com/9781/524/761/172/sales-assets/9781524761172_9781524761172_EducatorGuide_1.pdf
  39. Koirala, S. (2025). Systemic reforms for equitable education in Nepal: Bridging policy promises and persistent inequalities. Nepal Public Policy Review, 5(1), 173-204. https://doi.org/10.59552/nppr.v5i1.93
  40. Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029
  41. Krönke, M. (2020, June). Africa’s digital divide and the promise of e-learning (Policy Paper No. 66). Afrobarometer. https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/pp66-africas_digital_divide_and_the_promise_of_e-learning-afrobarometer_policy_paper-14june20.pdf
  42. Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2014). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.171
  43. Lazar, J., & Goldstein, A., Taylor, A. (2021). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Morgan Kaufmann. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2815674
  44. Lee, J. S. (2019). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12599
  45. Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of informal digital learning of English and a high-stakes English test on perceptions of English as an international language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5319
  46. Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5177
  47. Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.422
  48. Li, Y. (2025). Exploring digital literacy in informal digital learning of English among Chinese undergraduate students. Higher Education Studies, 15(3), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v15n3p293
  49. Lunga, P. (2024). Parent-teacher partnerships to enhance education for sustainable development: Early childhood development education learning centres in Zimbabwe. Journal of Education, 95, 91-111. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i95a05
  50. Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., & Wade, C. A. (2022). Sustainability and scalability of digital tools for learning: ABRACADABRA in Kenya. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(1), 1-29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1362758
  51. Maketo, L. (2018). Mobile learning Zimbabwe-lecturers' perceptions. International Association for the Development of the Information Society, 2018, 230-234. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590396
  52. Mangwaya, E., & Ngara, R. (2026). Harnessing artificial intelligence to foster critical thinking in Zimbabwean tertiary education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(2), 2958-2964. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200219
  53. McGrath, S., & Powell, L. (2016). Skills for sustainable development: Transforming vocational education and training beyond 2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 50, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.006
  54. Mendoza, M., & Heymann, J. (2022). Implementation of inclusive education: A systematic review of Studies of Inclusive Education Interventions in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 71(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2022.2095359
  55. Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
  56. Mweha, M. (2025). Digital learning innovations in Zimbabwe: A desk review of technological tools, pedagogical strategies, and accessibility challenges in the context of Education 5.0. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(07), 6280–6311. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000501
  57. Namibia Statistics Agency. (2016). Namibia Inter-Censal Demographic Survey Report. https://nsa.org.na/document/2016-namibia-intercensal-demographic-survey-nids/
  58. Nchaga, A. M. (2025). Exploring community-based learning: Opportunities and challenges. Research Output Journal of Arts and Management, 4(1), 46-42. https://doi.org/10.59298/ROJAM/2025/414652
  59. Ngara, R., & Ngara, M. M. (2024). Innovation for Social Transformation: E-Marking Challenges Faced by Students. A Case Study of Zimbabwe Open University. European Journal of Contemporary Education & E-Learning, 2(3), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(3).09
  60. Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9382-z
  61. Olawale, B. E., Omodan, B. I., & Saddiq, K. (2025,). X-raying the enablers and barriers of e-learning in higher education institutions: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1526076. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1526076
  62. O'Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., Lefrere, P., ... & Waycott, J. (2005). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. MOBIlearn project deliverable. https://hal.science/hal-00696244/
  63. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  64. Owens, T. R., & Wang, C. (1996). Community-based learning: A foundation for meaningful educational reform. Service Learning, General 37. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/37
  65. Pasipamire, N., Chigwada, J., & Maturure, R. (2025). Exploring the use and impact of artificial intelligence in higher education in Africa. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(3), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532046
  66. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
  67. Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe [POTRAZ] (2022). Abridged postal & telecommunications sector performance report: Fourth quarter 2022. https://www.techzim.co.zw/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Q4-2022-Abridged-Sector-Performance-report-pdf.pdf
  68. Rao, D., Lee, C., Fdilat, Y., Bouziane, A., & Dressman, M. (2024). Across four nations: Comparing the discourses of adolescents’ digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1338
  69. Rezai, A., Soyoof, A., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024). Ecological factors affecting students’ use of informal digital learning of English: EFL teachers’ perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, Article 104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104629
  70. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon and Schuster. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Diffusion_of_Innovations_5th_Edition.html?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC&redir_esc=y
  71. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED466086
  72. Salimi, F. (2025, April 10). The World Bank and EdTech in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evolving priorities, persistent gaps. NORRAG. https://www.norrageducation.org/the-world-bank-and-edtech-in-sub-saharan-africa-evolving-priorities-persistent-gaps/
  73. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240218229_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students
  74. Schwier, R. A. (2010). Focusing educational technology research on informal learning environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/5965
  75. Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1971993809727280011
  76. Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/education-and-technology-9781350145566/
  77. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/development-as-freedom-9780198297581?lang=en&cc=no
  78. Sey, A., & Ortoleva, P. (2014). All work and no play? Judging the uses of mobile phones in developing countries. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(3), 1–17. https://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/1280/487.html
  79. Snilstveit, B., Stevenson, J., Phillips, D., Vojtkova, M., Gallagher, E., Schmidt, T., Jobse, H. Geelen, M., Pastorello, M. G., & Eyers, J. (2015). Interventions to improve learning outcomes and access to education in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. 3ie Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.23846/SR10029
  80. Son, J.-B. (2015). Digital literacy. https://drjbson.com/ Retrieved from https://drjbson.com/projects/dl/
  81. Stockwell, G. (2022). Mobile-assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and challenges. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97811084/70728/frontmatter/9781108470728_frontmatter.pdf
  82. Stommel, J. (2014, November 17). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/
  83. Tarisayi, K. S., & Manhibi, R. (2025). Revolutionizing education in Zimbabwe: Stakeholder perspectives on strategic AI integration. Journal of Learning and Teaching in the Digital Age, 10(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1493508
  84. Taylor, D. L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. In J. Ryoo & K. Winkelmann (Eds.), Innovative learning environments in STEM higher education (pp. 17–26). SpringerBriefs in Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_2
  85. Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
  86. Thompson, P. S. (2018). Leave no one behind in practice: Education. Institute of Development Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/718433730/Working-Aid-Education-FR
  87. Tour, E. (2020). Teaching digital literacies in EAL/ESL classrooms: Practical strategies. TESOL Journal, 11(1), Article e00458. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.458
  88. Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. PublicAffairs. https://archive.org/details/geekheresyrescui0000toya
  89. UNESCO. (2006). Literacy for life – Global monitoring report 2006. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/cs/news/literacy-life-global-monitoring-report-2006
  90. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2018). Global education monitoring report 2018: Learning to learn. http://uis.unesco.org/
  91. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
  92. UNESCO. (2023). Africa emerges as the hotbed for EdTech. UNESCO Courier. https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/africa-emerges-hotbed-edtech
  93. UNICEF. (2021). How are children progressing through school? An education pathway analysis. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Education-Pathway-analysis-report-2021.pdf
  94. Unwin, T. (2017). Reclaiming information and communication technologies for development. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795292.001.0001
  95. van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge. https://www.wiley.com/en-sg/shop/cultural-studies-general/the-digital-divide-p-9781509534456
  96. Vorobyeva, K. I., Belous, S., Savchenko, N. V., Smirnova, L. M., Nikitina, S. A., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2025). Personalized learning through AI: Pedagogical approaches and critical insights. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), Article ep574. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16108
  97. W3C. (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-WCAG21-20180605/
  98. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001
  99. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
  100. Zakir, S., Hoque, M. E., Susanto, P., Nisaa, V., Alam, M. K., Khatimah, H., & Mulyani, E. (2025). Digital literacy and academic performance: the mediating roles of digital informal learning, self-efficacy, and students’ digital competence. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1590274. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1590274
  101. Zhang, Y., & Liu, G. (2024). Revisiting informal digital learning of English (IDLE): A structural equation modeling approach in a university EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1904-1936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2134424

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.