Home All Issues Issue articles Previous article

Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education

Viet Quoc Tran 1 * ,
Anh Tuan Do 1
1 Hanoi Metropolitan University, VIETNAM* Corresponding Author
Educational Point, 3(1), 2026, e150, https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
Publication date: Mar 20, 2026
Research Article
Open Access Open Access
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Research on academic dishonesty has predominantly framed misconduct as individual deviation or institutional governance failure. Less attention has been given to how knowledge itself is reorganised within digitally mediated and performance-driven university systems. This article addresses that gap by examining academic dishonesty in Vietnamese higher education as a configuration of knowledge circulation rather than solely as rule violation. The study draws on survey data from 500 undergraduate students across five universities in Hanoi and 20 semi-structured interviews with lecturers and academic administrators. Quantitative analysis maps the distribution of dishonest practices across institutional and disciplinary contexts, while qualitative accounts trace how these practices are rationalised and stabilised within routine academic exchanges. Findings indicate that misconduct concentrates in low-visibility coursework and collaborative settings where grade pressure, relational obligation, and infrastructural accessibility intersect. Rather than conforming to a single ethical model, academic dishonesty emerges through overlapping regimes of valuation in which knowledge is alternately commodified, reciprocated, and institutionally regulated. The analysis reframes academic dishonesty as a patterned reorganisation of knowledge legitimacy under contemporary educational conditions, contributing a structural account that complements existing individual- and governance-centred explanations.

KEYWORDS

academic dishonesty higher education knowledge circulation digital mediation relational obligation market logic

CITATION (APA)

Tran, V. Q., & Do, A. T. (2026). Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education. Educational Point, 3(1), e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
Harvard
Tran, V. Q., and Do, A. T. (2026). Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education. Educational Point, 3(1), e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
Vancouver
Tran VQ, Do AT. Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education. Educational Point. 2026;3(1):e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
AMA
Tran VQ, Do AT. Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education. Educational Point. 2026;3(1), e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
Chicago
Tran, Viet Quoc, and Anh Tuan Do. "Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education". Educational Point 2026 3 no. 1 (2026): e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167
MLA
Tran, Viet Quoc et al. "Academic Dishonesty as Knowledge Circulation: Commodity, Reciprocity, and Institutional Legitimacy in Vietnamese Higher Education". Educational Point, vol. 3, no. 1, 2026, e150. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18167

REFERENCES

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  2. Bozalek, V., Zembylas, M., & Tronto, J. C. (Eds.). (2020). Posthuman and political care ethics for reconfiguring higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003028468
  3. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
  4. Broeckelman-Post, M. A. (2008). Faculty and student classroom influences on academic dishonesty. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.910428
  5. Chiang, F. K., Zhu, D., & Yu, W. (2022). A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12656
  6. Colnerud, G., & Rosander, M. (2009). Academic dishonesty, ethical norms and learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802155263
  7. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1901_3
  8. Díaz, B., Lynch, C., Delgado, C., & Han, K. (2025). Analysis of two pedagogical approaches to foster discipline integrations in an educational data mining class using communities of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 12, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00538-2
  9. Đình, K. P. (2024). Giáo dục văn hóa học đường cho sinh viên các trường cao đẳng, đại học ở Việt Nam hiện nay [School culture education for college and university students in contemporary Vietnam]. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Dân tộc, 13(4), 60–65.
  10. Ercegovac, Z., & Richardson, J. V. (2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 65(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.4.301
  11. Giluk, T. L., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2015). Big five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.027
  12. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
  13. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  14. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  15. Hoa, N. T. Q., & Trung, Đ. T. (2024). Giải pháp mới hỗ trợ phát hiện gian lận trong kì thi trực tuyến [A new solution to support the detection of cheating in online examinations]. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội: Khoa học Giáo dục, 69(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2024-0037
  16. Hoàng, T. T. H., Lê, P. H., Đào, T. M. L., & Nguyễn, T. N. (2023). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến “liêm chính học thuật” của sinh viên trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số tại các trường đại học [Factors influencing academic integrity among students in the context of digital transformation in universities]. Tạp Chí Giáo Dục, 23(12), 29-33. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/796
  17. Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., & Davis, S. F. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–314.
  18. Kubisch, S., Parth, S., Deisenrieder, V., Oberauer, K., Stötter, J., & Keller, L. (2020). From transdisciplinary research to transdisciplinary education: The role of schools in contributing to community well-being and sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(1), Article 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010306
  19. Lan, P. T. (2020). Nâng cao hiệu quả giáo dục đạo đức cho sinh viên đại học ở Việt Nam hiện nay [Enhancing the effectiveness of moral education for university students in contemporary Vietnam]. Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ - IUH, 48(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.46242/jst-iuh.v48i6.1161
  20. Lin, C. H. S., & Wen, L. Y. M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education—A nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9047-z
  21. Macfarlane, B. (2016). The ethics of higher education: Contesting the values of the modern university. Routledge.
  22. McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446
  23. McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024954224675
  24. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.22697018
  25. Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an Integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
  26. Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320109599052
  27. Pecorari, D. (2015). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  28. Pente, P., Adams, C., & Yuen, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence, ethics, and art education in a posthuman world. In A. D. Knochel & O. Sahara (Eds.), Global media arts education (pp. 197–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05476-1_12
  29. Ruitenberg, C. W. (2011). The trouble with dispositions: A critical examination of personal beliefs, professional commitments and actual conduct in teacher education. Ethics and Education, 6(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2011.587347
  30. Scherling, J., & Kasa, T. (2024). Navigating the complexities of resistance in critical human rights education to promote democracy. Ethics and Education, 19(4), 536-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2024.2424131
  31. Siddiqui, J. R. (2016). Restyling the humanities curriculum of higher education for posthuman times. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220
  32. Talanker, S. (2024). Teaching teachers how to not solve moral dilemmas. Ethics and Education, 19(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2297130
  33. Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1018724900565

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.